The Pathology of the Female-Headed Family
Related Topics
"WaYf" yaxcoz...@sneakemail.com
THE PATHOLOGY OF THE FEMALE-HEADED FAMILY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Women," wrote Ramsey Clark in l970, in his celebrated book Crime in America, "are not a threat to the public." But he also wrote, in discussing the male juvenile criminals who are a threat to the public, that "three-fourths came from broken homes." That means mostly female-
headed homes. That means that while the single mothers of these criminals do not themselves commit crimes and go to prison, the socialization they give their children has an extraordinarily high correlation with the male crime of the next generation. This socialization, in fact, is the "root cause of crime" which Clark wrote his book to explore. He had found the explanation he sought and he didn't know it. It was concealed by the generation-long time-lag between cause and effect and by the sex-switch between generations: like hemophilia, crime is manifested in males but carried and transmitted by females--or rather by single females. Instead of seeing the true connection, Clark gave his readers this: If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is the dehumanizing effect on the individual of slums, racism, ignorance and violence, of corruption and impotence to fulfill rights, of poverty and unemployment and idleness, of generations of malnutrition, of congenital brain damage and prenatal neglect, of sickness and disease, of pollution, of decrepit, dirty, ugly, unsafe, overcrowded housing, of alcoholism and narcotics addiction, of avarice, anxiety, fear, hatred, hopelessness and injustice. These are the fountainheads of crime.
Not so. If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is its relationship with the female-headed family. Most criminals come from female-headed families. Most gang members come from female-headed families. Most addicts come from female-headed families. Most rapists come from female-headed families. Most educational failures come from female-headed families. Every presidential ******in before Hinckley came from a female-headed family or one in which he had an impossibly bad relationship with his father. Most illegitimate births occur to females who themselves grew up in female-headed families.
If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what we must do is reduce the number of female-headed families; what we must do is prevent the divorce courts from expelling half of society's fathers from their homes; what we must do is terminate a welfare system which displaces millions of men from the principal male role, that of family-provider.
What we must do is make the father the head of the family.
The female role, says Margaret Mead, is a biological fact; the male role is a social creation. This is the primary reality concerning human society. Motherhood has been the dominant feature of mammalian life since its beginning some two hundred million years ago, most conspicuously since the great reptiles became extinct and the Age of Mammals began sixty-five million years ago. Fatherhood in the sense of major male participation in reproduction is only a few million years old. Fatherhood in the sense of male headship of families is only a few thousand years old.
What is happening to our society is that it is discarding patriarchal sexual regulation and reverting to the primeval mammalian pattern of a reproductive unit consisting of the mother and her offspring, the male putting in an appearance to perform his minuscule sexual function and then disappearing or being hauled away to the sausage factory or being reduced to the role of stud who can be discarded when his female tires of him. "Men and women," rejoices feminist-anthropologist Helen Fisher, "are moving toward the kind of roles they had on the gr***lands of Africa millions of years ago....Human society is now discovering its ancient roots....The recent trend toward divorce and remarriage is another example of a throwback to earlier times....[T]he so-called new extended family [read: broken family] may actually have evolved millennia ago....At long last, society is moving in a direction that should be highly compatible with our ancient human spirit....The 'traditional' role of women is a recent invention." Biologically speaking, it is indeed a recent invention, scarcely older than the civilization which it made possible and which emerged coevally with it and created the wealth which reconciled women to accepting it. But women's new economic independence is leading them to yearn for a return to the prehistoric mammalian arrangement. "[W] herever women are economically powerful," says Fisher, "divorce rates are high. You see it in the Kung and you see it in the United States." Let's say, wherever women are economically powerful and there are no social guarantees to ensure male headship of families, divorce rates are high--such being the case among the Kung and the Americans. The Kung have no social guarantees to ensure male headship of families because the Kung never emerged from the Stone Age. The Americans have no social guarantees to ensure male headship of families because there exists an elementary confusion in the heads of policy makers, lawmakers and judges, who imagine that the obvious strength of the biological tie between the mother and the infant (the "biological fact" Margaret Mead refers to) means that it requires their ***istance. A biological fact does not require the services of the legal system. What does require these services is the weakest biological link in the family, the role of the father. It was the creation of this role--only a few thousand years ago--which made patriarchal civilization possible. Prior to that, mankind had to muddle through the million years of the Stone Age with the female-
headed reproductive arrangements of the ghetto, the barnyard and the rain forest.
ANNEX TO CHAPTER I The Annex is an essential part of the argument of this book and logically belongs at this point in the text. To place it here, however, would be placing a stumbling block in front of the reader, asking him to plow through fifty pages of tedious documentation, filled with repetitious overkill, proving the ***ertions made in Chapter I. Like the textual notes in an edition of Shakespeare, which nobody reads and which only one reader in hundreds consults, it has to be in the book but it does not have to be read. It is enough that the reader should know that there exists (and can be consulted on pages 000-000) proof that the high-crime, low- achieving areas of society are those with the greatest numbers of families headed by women and that the low-crime, high-achieving groups in society are those with stable, patriarchal families--that the feminist/sexual revolution and its attempt to impose a social organization based on female kinship is a failure and that it is necessary to return to a social organization based on male kinship.
http://www.mugu.com/cgi-bin/Upstream/Library/Amneus/garbage/index.html
Sue sebr...@thegrid.net
Well, thank God I (and my children) dodged the bullet on all that.
Not an educational failure, rapist, presidential ******in, gang member or addict in the bunch. OK, there's the one illegitimate birth.
Nobody's perfect.
Sue
"edi ...@netpath.net" <edi
Naive. Divorce is also common among the upper middle cl*** in America - but their kids being arrested on felony charges isn't. The only "correlation" here is in the black ghetto and Hispanic barrio.
No $4 to park! No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
Smug self righteous liberated repressed lesbian cunt, raising your kids without the benefit of a father and parading it as though it were something to be proud of.
"Not an educational failure, rapist, presidential ******in, gang member or addict in the bunch" - yeah, well some people successfully run across the freeway; does that mean that running across freeways is a good idea?
If anyone ever fired a bullet at you, I'm just sorry that you dodged it.
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
And there are upper middle cl*** kids from broken homes that get in trouble too, though not necessarily violent trouble.
Sue sebr...@thegrid.net
On 4 Feb 2006 16:19:04 -0800, "Grizzlie Antagonist" Damn. How'd you figure me out so quickly? Thanks for the compliment, BTW.
I'm thoroughly ashamed at how poorly my children turned out. Yes siree. Their father would have done a much better job. No doubt about that.
Ah, well. Such is life. Had I not dodged it (not that it ever happened) they could have been raised by their father who was always superior to me in every way. Too bad he never even considered taking the kids away from me. I'm sure they'd be better off today.
Sue - with a smile
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
Are you kidding? It was a cinch.
"robw" noddy...@comcast.net
And I've figured yr out.
Bet I get more mileage?
...
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
Me, too. It's 2006.
Sue sebr...@thegrid.net
On 4 Feb 2006 16:34:02 -0800, "Grizzlie Antagonist" I'm sure it was for someone with your obvious intelligence.
BTW, how can I be liberated *and* repressed?
Sue
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
It was certainly a pathetic attempt for someone with your lack of intelligence to try to disguise it.
You're liberated in your own imagination from dependence upon what you hold to be the hateful evil male sex.
You're repressed in the sense that you have not come to terms with your lesbianism.
"Joe S." a...@mous.com
Are you as stupid as the shit you write?
Oh, wait a minute, you write it -- you must be.
Sue sebr...@thegrid.net
On 4 Feb 2006 18:05:32 -0800, "Grizzlie Antagonist" Um, disguise what? That I'm a mug self righteous liberated repressed lesbian cunt? Hey, I agreed with you.
Thank you, oh wise one. I'll have to work on this. Lots of work.
Oh, so much work. Phew. I just don't know if I'm up to it. Besides the master will be here shortly for dinner so I need to get to work on that.
Sue
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
That doesn't follow. I could be intentionally "dumbing down" to a female level.
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
I'm glad to hear it. Hopefully, the clarification that I provided in response to your follow-up question seals the deal.
"Meldon" meldon_f...@meldon.com
He never got the chance did he slut?
"Meldon" meldon_f...@meldon.com
Doesn't make much sense until you're crying for government handouts.
"Meldon" meldon_f...@meldon.com
How many abortions have you had slut?
lazyike67 lazyik...@earthlink.net
Can't get a date can ya? lemme guess... You're a virgin who lives with mommy.
Now as Sue has MANY friends here I'd move along to another group as for me In to the kill file Mommy's boy.
Hell maybe we are too over protected.. idiots like this are not killing themselves quick enough...
Ike
lazyike67 lazyik...@earthlink.net
Another mommys bitch... All Mouth mo Brains or balls... Lemme guess your gay or a virgin? Mommy & the dog even turn you down for sex?
Must be bad when your mother spreads for every guy with a buck but won't give you & your boyfriend the time of day.
Plonk goes the killfile.
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
I see that "laziness" is only the least of your faults. Being a sissy male feminist is among the worst of them.
"Grizzlie Antagonist" lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com
If you're offering, I think that's one chance I'd p*** up.
Sue pretty much called for the extermination of the male sex, but since you're not really a particularly visible "member", I guess that it didn't concern you as much as it concerned me. But I'm not particularly impressed by feminazi logic which urges women to raise children without the benefit of a father figure or which fantasizes a world without men - just women and children. Surely, even you could see the illogic of that utopia if you took your head out of your twat.
I really can't commend you for writing phonetically either. I might not acknowledge "ya" next time. It reminds me of a Woody Allen's nonsense piece in the New Yorker about a man who stuttered in writing.
weathermans ...@yahoo.com
Don't attack Sue. She may be the exception. But stats say otherwise.
I happened to be born with a severe illness and got over it. I'm an exception too. But I don't deny the statistics as to what the reality is for others.
"Meldon" meldon_f...@meldon.com
Start saving up for the vaginal tuck. It's your last chance at happiness.
"Sandra Bull Ock" Kasan...@femism.net
You are probably also mentally ill Sue: http://www.gay.com/health/hiv/news/?2003/09/08/4 Two out of three members of England's gay, lesbian and bisexual (GLB) community are likely to suffer from depression and other mental health problems, according to a new study.
The high figure is compared to just one third of heterosexuals, said the University College London report, and stems from the intolerant attitudes GLB people face.
Researchers interviewed 2,400 gay men, lesbians and bisexuals for the three-year study.
A majority of those interviewed said coming to terms with their sexuality had led them to feelings of suicide, depression, with many also self-harming.
| To Top |